DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64539/sjer.v2i2.2026.405Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence in Process Safety, Physics-Informed Modeling, Digital Twin Simulation, Industrial Accident Prevention, Chemical Process Risk AnalysisAbstract
Industrial accidents in chemical process engineering continue to pose a significant issue despite the widespread use of Industry 4.0 technology and data-driven monitoring systems. Traditional safety frameworks often depend on either purely empirical machine learning models or deterministic first-principles simulations, creating a methodological split that constrains prediction reliability in uncommon, high-impact situations. This work bridges the structural gap by incorporating physics-informed artificial intelligence into a digital twin architecture for the avoidance of industrial accidents. A methodological framework driven by simulation was established, integrating first-principles process modeling, synthetic data generation with controlled fault injection, supervised and unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning for safety-constrained optimization. Physics-based limitations were included into the learning aim to maintain thermodynamic and transport consistency. The model's performance was assessed using safety-oriented criteria, such as detection delay, false negative rate, resilience to sensor noise, and stability amid parametric uncertainty. Results demonstrate that physics-informed models significantly reduce detection latency and false negatives in accident precursor regimes compared to purely data-driven baselines. The integration of constraint-aware learning improves extrapolation stability under class imbalance conditions typical of industrial safety datasets. Furthermore, explainable AI mechanisms enhance interpretability and regulatory transparency. These findings indicate that AI-enhanced simulation models reconfigure accident prevention strategies by shifting from reactive threshold systems to proactive, mechanism-consistent risk anticipation frameworks applicable to safety-critical chemical processes.
References
[1] N. Tamascelli et al., “Learning about risk: A systematic literature review of machine learning applications for engineering system safety and reliability,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 90, p. 105343, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105343.
[2] A. Khan et al., “Accident and incident analysis in the oil and gas sector using artificial intelligence and machine learning,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 251, pp. 295–302, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.113.
[3] R. Pinto and G. Gonçalves, “Application of artificial immune systems in advanced manufacturing,” Array, vol. 15, p. 100238, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2022.100238.
[4] A. Morchid et al., “Fire risk assessment systems using AI and IoT technologies: Benefits and challenges,” Internet Things, vol. 33, p. 101704, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2025.101704.
[5] L. Xue and Z. Pang, “Ethical governance of artificial intelligence: An integrated analytical framework,” J. Digital Economy, vol. 1, pp. 44–52, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.08.003.
[6] A. Al Tahhan et al., “Recent advancements in artificial neural network-based temperature prediction for lithium-ion batteries,” AI Thermal Fluids, vol. 4, p. 100014, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aitf.2025.100014.
[7] R. Joshi, S. Ruikar, y S. Sapte, “AI-Driven Digital Twins: A Theoretical Framework for Predictive Decision-Making in Manufacturing and Supply Chains,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 421-427, Nov. 2025. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.11.39.
[8] A. Johannssen, P. Qiu, A. Yeganeh, N. Chukhrova, “Explainable AI for trustworthy intelligent process monitoring,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 209, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111407.
[9] N. Tamascelli et al., “Artificial Intelligence for safety and reliability: A descriptive, bibliometric and interpretative review on machine learning,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 90, 2024, Art. no. 105343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105343.
[10] Suárez et al, “Understanding the research on air traffic controller workload and its implications for safety: A science mapping-based analysis,” Safety Science, vol. 176, 2024, Art. no. 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106545.
[11] M. Yaqot, B. C. Menezes, J. D. Kelly, “Real-time coordination of multiple shuttle-conveyor-belts for inventory control of multi-quality stockpiles,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 178, 2024, Art. no. 108388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108388.
[12] J. Kafunah, M. I. Ali, and J. G. Breslin, “Handling Imbalanced Datasets for Robust Deep Neural Network-Based Fault Detection in Manufacturing Systems,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 21, art. 9783, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219783.
[13] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, pp. 436–444, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.
[14] A. Varbella, B. Gjorgiev, G. Sansavini, “Geometric deep learning for online prediction of cascading failures in power grids,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 237, 2023, Art. no. 109341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109341.
[15] F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z. Zhou, “Isolation forest,” IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2008, pp. 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.17.
[16] L. Busoniu et al., “Reinforcement Learning for Control: Performance, Stability, and Deep Approximators,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 46, pp. 8–28, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.09.005.
[17] S. Skogestad, “Control structure design for complete chemical plants,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 219–234, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.08.002.
[18] A. Kumar, R. Raj, A. Kumar, B. Verma, “Design of a novel mixed interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller for 2-DOF robot manipulator with payload,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 123, 2023, Art. no. 106329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106329.
[19] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.
[20] A. Aziz, and Sowmyashree, “AI-Powered Predictive Maintenance System for Industrial Equipment: Reducing Downtime and Costs Through Sensor-B,” Journal of Scientific Research and Technology, vol. 3, no. 8, 2025. https://www.jsrtjournal.com/index.php/JSRT/article/view/387.
[21] A. Bozgeyik, L. Altay, A. Hepbasli, “Energetic, exergetic, exergoeconomic, environmental and sustainability analyses of a solar, geothermal and biomass based novel multi-generation system for production of power, hydrogen, heating, cooling and fresh water,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 177, 2023, pp. 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.018.
[22] M. Shiea, A. Buffo, M. Vanni, D. L. Marchisio, “A novel finite-volume TVD scheme to overcome non-realizability problem in quadrature-based moment methods,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 409, 2020, Art. no. 109337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109337.
[23] A. Morchid et al., “Fire risk assessment system for food and sustainable farming using ai and IoT technologies: Benefits and challenges,” Internet of Things, vol. 33, 2025, Art. no. 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2025.101704.
[24] E. G. Acuña Acuña, “Engineering-Oriented Bioinformatics Data Repository for Predictive Modeling of Complex Biological Systems”. Zenodo, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18190677.
[25] X. Meng, E. E. Karniadakis, “A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 401, 2020, Art. no. 109020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109020.
[26] I. Mezgár, J. Váncza, “From ethics to standards – A path via responsible AI to cyber-physical production systems,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 53, 2022, pp. 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.04.002.
[27] S. Pan and Q. Yang, “A survey on transfer learning,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1345–1359, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.191.
[28] S. M. Lundberg and S. I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html.
[29] A. Haleem, M. Javaid, R. P. Singh, “Encouraging Safety 4.0 to enhance industrial culture: An extensive study of its technologies, roles, and challenges,” Green Technologies and Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 3, 2025, Art. no. 100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2024.100158.
[30] V. Salehi, H. Zarei, G. A. Shirali, K. Hajizadeh, “An entropy-based TOPSIS approach for analyzing and assessing crisis management systems in petrochemical industries,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 67, 2020, Art. no. 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104241.
[31] D. Shan, B. Neis, “Employment-related mobility, regulatory weakness and potential fatigue-related safety concerns in short-sea seafaring on Canada’s Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway: Canadian seafarers’ experiences,” Safety Science, vol. 121, pp. 165-176, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.017.
[32] J. M. Douglas, Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1988. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=M6JTAAAAMAAJ.
[33] E. Glaessgen and D. Stargel, “The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. Air Force vehicles,” in Proc. 53rd AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818.
[34] Q. Kong, K. Kuriyan, N. Shah, M. Guo, “Development of a responsive optimisation framework for decision-making in precision agriculture,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 131, 2019, Art. no. 106585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106585.
[35] Z. Ge, Z. Song, S. X. Ding, and B. Huang, “Data mining and analytics in the process industry: The role of machine learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 20590–20616, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756872.
[36] S. Yin, X. Zhu, and O. Kaynak, “Improved PLS focused on key-performance-indicator-related fault diagnosis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1651–1658, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2345331.
[37] J. An and S. Cho, “Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability,” Special Lecture on IE, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2015. http://dm.snu.ac.kr/static/docs/TR/SNUDM-TR-2015-03.pdf.
[38] H. Yoo, B. Kim, J. W. Kim, J. H. Lee, “Reinforcement learning based optimal control of batch processes using Monte-Carlo deep deterministic policy gradient with phase segmentation,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 144, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107133.
[39] L. Yang, D. Zhang, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equations,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 42, no. 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1225409.
[40] Y. Xu et al., “Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 230, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108900.
[41] M. Khani et al., “Explainable AI reveals temporal risk pathways in fall prediction: Extracting clinical insights from multi-horizon machine learning models,” GeroScience, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-026-02117-x.
[42] E. G. Acuña Acuña, “AI-Ready Simulation Dataset for Chemical Process Safety and Accident Prevention”. Zenodo, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18200704.
[43] Z. A. B. Sinnah, “Explainable AI-driven predictive maintenance for mitigating process safety risks in safety-critical industrial equipment,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 100, Art. no. 105907, Apr. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105907.
[44] S. Mane et al, “Digital twin in the chemical industry: A review,” Digital Twins and Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 118-130, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1049/dgt2.12019.
[45] A. V. Alshehri, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Process Systems: Handling Plant-Model Mismatch,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 63, pp. 13650–13659, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00690.
[46] H. Chen et al., “Review of imbalanced fault diagnosis technology based on generative adversarial networks,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 99–124, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwae075.
[47] A. Hoenig, K. Roy, Y. T. Acquaah, S. Yi, and S. S. Desai, “Explainable AI for cyber-physical systems: Issues and challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 73113–73140, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3395444.
[48] B. Bolat-Akça and E. Bozkaya-Aras, “Digital twin-assisted intelligent anomaly detection system for Internet of Things,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 158, Art. no. 103484, May 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103484.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edwin Gerardo Acuña Acuña
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
