Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Stunting Classification

Authors

  • Muhajir Yunus Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Kunta Biddinika Master Program of Informatics, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
  • Abdul Fadlil Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59247/sjer.v1i2.9

Keywords:

Stunting Classification, Machine Learning, Decision Tree C4.5, Naïve Bayes

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries with medium stunting data over the past decade, around 21.6%. Stunting prevention is a national program in Indonesia, and stunting reduction in children is the first of the six goals in the Global Nutrition Target for 2025. Based on SSGI data in 2022, the prevalence of stunting in Gorontalo Province is 23.8% and is in the high category. Stunting prevention is an early effort to improve the ability and quality of human resources. This study compared two Machine Learning algorithms for stunting classification in children, namely the Naive Bayes method and Decision Tree C4.5 using Python by dividing the training and testing data a total ratio of 80:20. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated using a dataset of child health information based on z-score calculation data with a total of 224 records, consisting of 4 attributes and 1 label, namely gender, age, weight, height and nutritional status. The results of the research that have been conducted show that the Decision Tree C4.5 algorithm achieves the highest accuracy in the classification of stunting events with an accuracy of 87% while for the Naïve Bayes algorithm produces a low accuracy of 71% so that for this study the Decision tree C4.5 algorithm is the best algorithm for the classification of stunting events. These findings suggest this algorithm can be a valuable tool for classifying children's stunting.

References

[1] J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Huang, and J. Huo, “Prevalence of Malnutrition and Associated Factors of Stunting among 6–23-Month-Old Infants in Central Rural China in 2019,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 15, p. 8165, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158165.

[2] M. S. Islam, A. N. Zafar Ullah, S. Mainali, Md. A. Imam, and M. I. Hasan, “Determinants of stunting during the first 1,000 days of life in Bangladesh: A review,” Food Sci Nutr, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 4685–4695, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1795.

[3] A. D. Laksono, N. E. W. Sukoco, T. Rachmawati, and R. D. Wulandari, “Factors Related to Stunting Incidence in Toddlers with Working Mothers in Indonesia,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 17, p. 10654, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710654.

[4] T. Huriah and N. Nurjannah, “Risk Factors of Stunting in Developing Countries: A Scoping Review,” Open Access Maced J Med Sci, vol. 8, no. F, pp. 155–160, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2020.4466.

[5] M. Ponum et al., “Stunting diagnostic and awareness: Impact assessment study of sociodemographic factors of stunting among school-going children of Pakistan,” BMC Pediatr, vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02139-0.

[6] S. Khan, S. Zaheer, and N. F. Safdar, “Determinants of stunting, underweight and wasting among children < 5 years of age: evidence from 2012-2013 Pakistan demographic and health survey,” BMC Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 358, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6688-2.

[7] E. Yunitasari, R. Pradanie, H. Arifin, D. Fajrianti, and B.-O. Lee, “Determinants of Stunting Prevention among Mothers with Children Aged 6–24 Months,” Open Access Maced J Med Sci, vol. 9, no. B, pp. 378–384, May 2021, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6106.

[8] T. Antoniou and M. Mamdani, “Evaluation of machine learning solutions in medicine,” Can Med Assoc J, vol. 193, no. 36, pp. E1425–E1429, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210036.

[9] I. H. Sarker, “Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions,” SN Comput Sci, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 160, May 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x.

[10] J. Qiu, Q. Wu, G. Ding, Y. Xu, and S. Feng, “A survey of machine learning for big data processing,” EURASIP J Adv Signal Process, vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 67, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s13634-016-0355-x.

[11] S. Ray, “A Quick Review of Machine Learning Algorithms,” in 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon), IEEE, Feb. 2019, pp. 35–39. doi: 10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862451.

[12] O. N. Chilyabanyama et al., “Performance of Machine Learning Classifiers in Classifying Stunting among Under-Five Children in Zambia,” Children, vol. 9, no. 7, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/children9071082.

[13] M. M. Islam et al., “Application of machine learning based algorithm for prediction of malnutrition among women in Bangladesh,” International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 46–57, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcce.2022.02.002.

[14] F. H. Bitew, C. S. Sparks, and S. H. Nyarko, “Machine learning algorithms for predicting undernutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia,” Public Health Nutr, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 269–280, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004262.

[15] H. M. Fenta, T. Zewotir, and E. K. Muluneh, “A machine learning classifier approach for identifying the determinants of under-five child undernutrition in Ethiopian administrative zones,” BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, vol. 21, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01652-1.

[16] E. Harrison et al., “Machine learning model demonstrates stunting at birth and systemic inflammatory biomarkers as predictors of subsequent infant growth – a four-year prospective study,” BMC Pediatr, vol. 20, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02392-3.

[17] M. de Onis et al., “Prevalence thresholds for wasting, overweight and stunting in children under 5 years.,” Public Health Nutr, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 175–179, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002434.

[18] S.-A. N. Alexandropoulos, S. B. Kotsiantis, and M. N. Vrahatis, “Data preprocessing in predictive data mining,” Knowl Eng Rev, vol. 34, p. e1, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1017/S026988891800036X.

[19] J. R. Quinlan, Induction of Decision Trees, vol. 1, no. 1. Machine Learning, 1986. doi: 10.1023/A:1022643204877.

[20] Y. Lu, T. Ye, and J. Zheng, “Decision Tree Algorithm in Machine Learning,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA), IEEE, Aug. 2022, pp. 1014–1017. doi: 10.1109/AEECA55500.2022.9918857.

[21] J. Jiang, X. Zhu, G. Han, M. Guizani, and L. Shu, “A Dynamic Trust Evaluation and Update Mechanism Based on C4.5 Decision Tree in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Trans Veh Technol, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 9031–9040, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.2999566.

[22] Y. Wang, “Prediction of Rockburst Risk in Coal Mines Based on a Locally Weighted C4.5 Algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 15149–15155, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053001.

[23] Y.-C. Zhang and L. Sakhanenko, “The naive Bayes classifier for functional data,” Stat Probab Lett, vol. 152, pp. 137–146, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2019.04.017.

[24] S. Ruan, H. Li, C. Li, and K. Song, “Class-Specific Deep Feature Weighting for Naïve Bayes Text Classifiers,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 20151–20159, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968984.

[25] J. Xu, Y. Zhang, and D. Miao, “Three-way confusion matrix for classification: A measure driven view,” Inf Sci (N Y), vol. 507, pp. 772–794, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.064.

[26] M. Hasnain, M. F. Pasha, I. Ghani, M. Imran, M. Y. Alzahrani, and R. Budiarto, “Evaluating Trust Prediction and Confusion Matrix Measures for Web Services Ranking,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 90847–90861, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994222.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Yunus, M., Biddinika, M. K., & Fadlil, A. (2025). Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Stunting Classification. Scientific Journal of Engineering Research, 1(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.59247/sjer.v1i2.9

Issue

Section

Articles