An Intelligent Conversational Agent for Flood Risk Communication in a Flood-Prone Region of Nigeria

Authors

  • Willie Ebipamobonumugha Bayelsa State Polytechnic Aleibiri, Nigeria
  • Ugochukwu Onwudebelu Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-4160
  • Efe Darel Kokogbiya Bayelsa State Polytechnic Aleibiri, Nigeria
  • Justina Ogoja Bayelsa State Polytechnic Aleibiri, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64539/sjcs.v2i2.2026.411

Keywords:

Conversational agent, Chatbox, Flood risk communication, Disaster management, Natural language processing, Bayelsa State, Public awareness

Abstract

Flooding remains one of the most devastating natural hazards in developing countries, with significant impacts on human lives, infrastructure, and livelihoods. In Nigeria, particularly in Bayelsa State, recurrent flooding events highlight the need for effective and accessible flood risk communication systems. However, existing approaches largely rely on static and non-interactive dissemination channels, limiting timely public engagement and response. This study addresses this gap by designing and implementing a conversational agent capable of providing real-time responses to frequently asked flood-related questions. The proposed system adopts a rule-based conversational framework supported by natural language preprocessing techniques, including tokenization and normalization, for query interpretation. A structured knowledge base containing flood preparedness and response information was developed for the study area. The system was evaluated using a set of 120 representative flood-related queries derived from domain-specific scenarios. Experimental results show that the chatbot achieved a response accuracy of 87.5% and a successful query handling rate of 90.8%. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of conversational agents as effective tools for enhancing flood risk communication and public awareness. The study contributes to the integration of artificial intelligence-driven solutions into disaster risk management and highlights the potential of chatbot systems in improving access to critical environmental information in resource-constrained settings.

References

[1] T. Haer, W. J. W. Botzen, and J. C. J. H. Aerts, “The effectiveness of flood risk communication strategies and the influence of social networks-Insights from an agent-based model,” Envi-ronmental Science & Policy, vol. 60, pp. 44–52, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.006.

[2] M. U. Mia et al., “Sustainable flood risk assessment using deep learning-based algorithms with blockchain technology,” Geocarto International, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2112982.

[3] S. Islam and Z. Chik, “Disaster in Bangladesh and management with advanced information system,” Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 521–530, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561111178952.

[4] H. S. Munawar et al., “Post-flood risk management and resilience building practices: A case study,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, p. 4823, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114823.

[5] K. Nimavat and P. T. Champaneria, “Chatbots: An overview of types, architecture, tools, and future possibilities,” International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1019-1024, 2017. https://www.ijsrd.com/articles/IJSRDV5I70501.pdf.

[6] L. T. Car et al., “Conversational agents in health care: Scoping review and conceptual analy-sis,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 22, no. 8, e17158, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2196/17158.

[7] M. M. E. van Pinxteren, M. Pluymaekers, and J. G. A. M. Lemmink, “Human-like communi-cation in conversational agents: A literature review and research agenda,” Journal of Service Management, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 203–225, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2019-0175.

[8] M. Rheu, J. Shin, W. Peng, and J. Huh-Yoo, “Trust-building factors and implications for con-versational agent design: A systematic review,” International Journal of Human–Computer In-teraction, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 81–96, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710.

[9] A. Bhattacharjee et al., “Understanding communication preferences of information workers in engagement with text-based conversational agents,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20468, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.20468.

[10] J. O. Ugah and U. Onwudebelu, “FPAS system: The new frontier in flood prediction and the lifesaver for flood-prone communities,” African Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 1–2, 2023.

[11] U. Onwudebelu et al., “FPAS model: A case study of flood prediction and advisory system,” Sumerianz Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 7–19, 2024, https://doi.org/10.47752/sjsr.72.7.19.

[12] U. Onwudebelu, J. O. Ugah, and O. O. Fasola, “Harnessing disruptive technologies for flood prediction and advisory systems through persuasive modeling,” Digital Technologies Re-search and Applications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113–135, 2025, https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i3.1648.

[13] U. Onwudebelu et al., “Turning data into actionable intelligence for flood prediction and advisory system,” Journal of Systematic and Modern Science Research, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1–12, 2026, https://doi.org/10.70382/bejsmsr.v10i9.014.

[14] N. A. Ahmad et al., “Review of chatbots design techniques,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 7–12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5120/IJCA2018917606.

[15] J. J. Bird, A. Ekárt, and D. R. Faria, “Learning from interaction: An intelligent networked-based human-bot and bot-bot chatbot system,” in Proc. UK Workshop on Computational Intel-ligence, pp. 179–190, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97982-3_15.

[16] N. Svenningsson and M. Faraon, “Artificial intelligence in conversational agents: A study of factors related to perceived humanness in chatbots,” in Proc. 2nd Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conf., pp. 151-161, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1145/3375959.3375973.

[17] X. Sun et al., “Can a funny chatbot make a difference? Infusing humor into conversational agents for behavioral intervention,” in Proc. 6th ACM Conf. Conversational User Interfaces, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1145/3640794.3665555.

[18] T. W. Liew et al., “Cringe, lit, or mid: Affective and cognitive effects of youth slang in an ed-ucational chatbot,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 256, p. 105036, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105036.

[19] Y. Wang et al., “Benefits of affective pedagogical agents in multimedia instruction,” Fron-tiers in Psychology, vol. 12, p. 797236, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797236.

[20] A. Abdellatif et al., “A comparison of natural language understanding platforms for chat-bots in software engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 3087–3102, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2021.3078384.

[21] A. Abdellatif et al., “Challenges in chatbot development: A study of Stack Overflow posts,” in Proc. 17th IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 174–185, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1145/3379597.3387472.

[22] M. Dhyani and R. Kumar, “An intelligent chatbot using deep learning with bidirectional RNN and attention model,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 34, pp. 817–824, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.450.

[23] V. Ghildiyal, “An intelligent chatbot using deep learning with bidirectional GRU and CNN model,” International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 258-270, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMOR.2024.142137.

[24] H. T. Hien et al., “Intelligent assistants in higher-education environments: The FIT-EBot, a chatbot for administrative and learning support,” in Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Information and Communication Technology, pp. 69-76, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1145/3287921.3287937.

[25] A. Pradana, G. O. Sing, and Y. J. Kumar, “SamBot: Intelligent conversational bot for interac-tive marketing with consumer-centric approach,” International Journal of Computer Infor-mation Systems and Industrial Management Applications, vol. 9, no. 11, 2017. https://cspub-ijcisim.org/index.php/ijcisim/article/view/361.

[26] N. F. Davar, M. A. A. Dewan, X. Zhang, “AI chatbots in education: Challenges and opportu-nities,” Information, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 235, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030235.

[27] H. Li et al., “Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being,” NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 6, Art. no. 79, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5.

[28] J. Qin et al., “Effectiveness of communication competence in AI conversational agents for health: Systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 27, e76296, 2025, https://doi.org/10.2196/76296.

[29] F. Yang et al., “Use of artificial intelligence–based chatbots to promote physical activity: A systematic review of interventions,” Kinesiology Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 80-92, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2024-0081.

[30] M. Vidal-Sepúlveda, C. Olivares-Rodríguez, and A. Sanhueza, “Intelligent conversational agent as an active strategy for school safety management,” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1010–1029, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2579309.

[31] H. Carlos, S. German, and S. Dixon, “Tashi-Bot: An intelligent personal assistant for users in an educational institution,” Preprints, 2021, https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202108.0380.v1.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Ebipamobonumugha, W., Onwudebelu, U., Kokogbiya, E. D., & Ogoja, J. (2026). An Intelligent Conversational Agent for Flood Risk Communication in a Flood-Prone Region of Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Computer Science, 2(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.64539/sjcs.v2i2.2026.411

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.