DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64539/sjcs.v2i2.2026.456Keywords:
SECO, SLR, Mitigation Strategies, Software architecture, Software ecosystem architectureAbstract
Software ecosystems (SECO) play a crucial role in modern software development by enabling accelerated innovation, collaboration among multiple stakeholders, and efficient utilization of shared resources and technologies. However, achieving these benefits requires robust, adaptable, and well-structured architectural design and management. Despite their importance, SECO architectures face several critical challenges, including interface instability, security vulnerabilities, scalability limitations, governance complexity, sustainability concerns, and evolving ecosystem dynamics. Although prior studies have explored individual aspects of SECO, there is a clear research gap in providing a comprehensive and systematic synthesis of architectural challenges and their corresponding mitigation strategies. In particular, no systematic literature review (SLR) has thoroughly examined these issues in an integrated manner. To address this gap, this study aims to systematically identify, categorize, and analyze architectural challenges in SECO and evaluate existing mitigation techniques. A structured SLR methodology is employed to collect, assess, and synthesize relevant literature, leading to the development of a conceptual framework that organizes both challenges and solutions. The findings reveal that key mitigation strategies—such as modularization, variability management, custom design approaches, and sandboxing—can significantly improve architectural stability, scalability, and sustainability. These results provide valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners by offering a consolidated understanding of SECO architectural issues and practical guidance for designing more resilient and sustainable software ecosystems.
References
[1] R. Rajab and M. Alnoukari, “DevOps integration with capability model maturity integration: A systematic mapping review,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 31829- 31841, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3542630.
[2] Y. G. Soureya et al, “Adaptive software development: A comprehensive framework integrating artificial intelligence for sustainable evolution,” International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 248–262, 2025. https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/22/2/4.
[3] E. Onagh and M. Nayebi, “Extension decisions in open source software ecosystem,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 212, p. 112552, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112552.
[4] K. Saarni, M. Raatikainen, and S. Hyrynsalmi, “Failures in software ecosystems: A systematic literature review,” in Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Innovation, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC65658.2025.11106539.
[5] A. Raj and R. Deora, “AI and ML powered feature prioritization in software product development,” International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdkp.2025.15102.
[6] S. Hegazy et al, “Overcoming experimentation challenges in software ecosystems of large product and service organizations: A participatory action research study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 230, p. 112550, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112550.
[7] J. Sun et al, “Collaboration challenges and opportunities in developing scientific open-source software ecosystem: A case study on Astropy,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1–33, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3757462.
[8] Z. Yang, J. Shi, P. Devanbu, and David Lo, “Ecosystem of large language models for code,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/1234567.1234569.
[9] R. Feitosa et al, “Actionable Framework for Understanding and Improving Social and Human Factors that Influence the Requirements Management in Software Ecosystems,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3795773.
[10] A. Katal, P. Prasanna, R. Birla, and Kunal, “Evolution from monolithic to microservices architecture: A new era in software architecture,” in Advancements in Optimization and Nature-Inspired Computing for Solutions in Contemporary Engineering Challenges, Springer, 2025, pp. 235–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0706-8_12.
[11] O. M. Albada and N. Salman, “Software architecture in practice: Challenges and opportunities in the age of digital transformation: Literature review,” 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381291461.
[12] S. S. Amorim, E. S. De Almeida, and J. D. McGregor, “Extensibility in ecosystem architectures: An initial study,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, 2013, pp. 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501585.2501588.
[13] A. Ghazawneh and O. Henfridsson, “Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 173–192, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x.
[14] B. Ghimire, Z. S. Li, and D. Damian, “Understanding user feedback in software ecosystems: A study on challenges and mitigation strategies,” in International Conference on Software Business, pp 132–147, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53227-6_10.
[15] K. Henttonen, M. Matinlassi, E. Niemelä, and T. Kanstren, “Integrability and extensibility evaluation from software architectural models: A case study,” Open Software Engineering Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874107X00701010001.
[16] E. Constantinou and I. Stamelos, “Architectural stability and evolution measurement for software reuse,” in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2015, pp. 1580–1585. https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2695895.
[17] M. Alenezi, “Software architecture quality measurement: Stability and understandability,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 292–299, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070775.
[18] C. F. Alves, J. A. Oliveira, and S. Jansen, “Understanding governance mechanisms and health in software ecosystems: A systematic literature review,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93375-7_24.
[19] V. M. Melnuk, K. V. Melnuk, and N. A. Khrystynets, “Key performance indicators based software ecosystem (SECO) research using publications systematic mapping,” Komp’iuterno-intehrovani tekhnolohii: osvita, nauka, vyrobnytstvo, no. 20, pp. 57–66, 2015.
[20] M. Galster, P. Avgeriou, D. Weyns, and T. Männistö, “Variability in software architecture: current practice and challenges,” ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 30–32, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/2020976.2020978.
[21] B. Kitchenham and P. Brereton, “A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2049–2075, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010.
[22] D. Namiot, M. Sneps-Sneppe, “On micro-services architecture,” International Journal of Open Information Technologies, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 24–29, 2014. http://injoit.ru/index.php/j1/article/view/139/104.
[23] V. Dixit and D. Kaur, “A systematic review for sustainable software development practice and paradigm,” Journal of Computational Analysis & Applications, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 170–185, 2024. https://eudoxuspress.com/index.php/pub/article/view/730.
[24] S. S. Amorim et al, “Flexibility in ecosystem architectures,” in Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642803.2642817.
[25] I. Carvalho et al, “HEAL ME: An architecture for health software ecosystem evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM Joint 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and 11th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (JSOS), 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSOS.2017.13.
[26] B. Schwichtenberg and G. Engels, “SECOarc: A framework for architecting healthy software ecosystems,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1269, pp. 95–106, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59155-7_8.
[27] A. Abdalla, V. Ströele, F. Campos, R. Braga, J. M. N. David, “A software ecosystem platform for the development of recommender systems,” Research Square preprint, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34335/v1.
[28] E. Manalif, L. F. Capretz, and D. Ho, “Software ecosystems risks,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT), 2013, pp. 417–422. https://www.academia.edu/download/32528954/Ekananta-Iceland-v2.pdf.
[29] M. Che and D. E. Perry, “Architectural design decisions in open software development: A transition to software ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Software Engineering Conference, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2014.37.
[30] S. S. Amorim et al, “Software ecosystems’ architectural health: Another view,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Joint 6th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (JSOS), 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSOS.2017.15.
[31] K. Telschig et al, “SECO patterns: Architectural decision support in software ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Decision Making in Software Architecture (MARCH), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/MARCH.2016.10.
[32] W. Schueller and J. Wachs, “Modeling interconnected social and technical risks in open source software ecosystems,” Collective Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 26339137241231912, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137241231912.
[33] K. Manikas, “Revisiting software ecosystems research: A longitudinal literature study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 117, pp. 84–103, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.003.
[34] M. Iansiti and R. Levien, “Strategy as ecology,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 68–81, 2004. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15029791/.
[35] J. Bosch and P. Bosch-Sijtsema, “From integration to composition: On the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystems,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.051.
[36] D. Dhungana, I. Groher, E. Schludermann, and S. Biffl, “Software ecosystems vs. natural ecosystems: learning from the ingenious mind of nature,” in Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Software Architecture, 2010, pp. 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1842752.1842777.
[37] R. Kazman, M. Gagliardi, and W. Wood. "Scaling up software architecture analysis." Journal of Systems and Software 85, no. 7, pp. 1511-1519, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.050.
[38] A. Tiwana, Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IYDhAAAAQBAJ.
[39] S. Jansen, “How quality attributes of software platform architectures influence software ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Ecosystem Architectures (WEA), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2013, pp. 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501585.2501587.
[40] J. Bosch, “Architecture challenges for software ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 93-95, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1842752.1842776.
[41] K. Lyytinen, Y. Yoo, and R. J. Boland, “Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 47–75, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093.
[42] M. De Stefano, F. Pecorelli, Da. A. Tamburri, F. Palomba, A. De Lucia, “Refactoring Recommendations Based on the Optimization of Socio-Technical Congruence,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), 2020, pp. 794–796. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME46990.2020.00094.
[43] R. T. da Silva, F. L. Gustavo, E. D. Audacio, and E. C. Genvigir, “Identifying actors to support software ecosystem health,” in Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM Joint 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (JSOS), 2017, pp. 76–77. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSOS.2017.8.
[44] R. Santos, C. Werner, O. Barbosa, and C. Alves, “Software Ecosystems: Trends and Impacts on Software Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2012 26th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES), Natal, Brazil, 2012, pp. 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2012.24.
[45] D. A. Tamburri, P. Lago, and H. van Vliet, “Organizational social structures for software engineering,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 1, art. no. 3, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2522968.2522971.
[46] F. V. Pinheiro, E. Coutinho, M. E. Silva, C. Bezerra, “A systematic mapping of health, quality, evolution, simulation and modeling in software ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, 2024, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3658271.3658297.
[47] A. Zimmermann, R. Schmidt, D. Jugel, and M. Möhring, “Evolving enterprise architectures for digital transformations,” in Proceedings of Gesellschaft für Informatik, 2015, pp. 183–194. https://publikationen.reutlingen-university.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/609/file/609.pdf.
[48] R. Weinreich and I. Groher, “Software architecture knowledge management approaches and their support for knowledge management activities: A systematic literature review,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 80, pp. 265–286, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.09.007.
[49] J. Schmidt and N. J. Foss, “Modularity, adaptation problems, and the governance and problem-solving capabilities of core firms in ecosystems,” Journal of Management, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1484–1513, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231215023.
[50] H. Koziolek, “Sustainability evaluation of software architectures: A systematic review,” in Proceedings of the 2011 Federated Events on Component-Based Software Engineering, Software Architecture, QoSA+ISARCS, 2011, pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2000259.2000263.
[51] M. E. Fayad, H. S. Hamza, and H. A. Sanchez, “Towards scalable and adaptable software architectures,” in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, 2005, pp. 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI-05.2005.1506457.
[52] G. Brataas, P. Hughes, “Exploring architectural scalability,” in Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Software and performance, 2004, pp. 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/974044.974064.
[53] A. B. Bondi, “The software architect as the guardian of system performance and scalability,” in Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Leadership and Management in Software Architecture, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/LMSA.2009.5074861.
[54] L. Duboc, D. S. Rosenblum, and T. Wicks, “A framework for characterization and analysis of software system scalability,” in Proceedings of the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering, 2007, pp. 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254391.1254410.
[55] R. Kazman, M. Gagliardi, and W. Wood, “Scaling up software architecture analysis,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1511–1519, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.050.
[56] J. Bosch, “Software architecture: The next step,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3047, pp. 194–199, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24769-2_14.
[57] S. S. Jalali, H. Rashidi, and E. Nazemi, “A new approach to evaluate performance of component-based software architecture,” in Proceedings of the 2011 UKSim 5th European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2011, pp. 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2011.77.
[58] M. H. Valipour, B. Amirzafari, K. N. Maleki, and N. Daneshpour, “A brief survey of software architecture concepts and service-oriented architecture,” in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), 2009, pp. 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSIT.2009.5235004.
[59] P. Oreizy, N. Medvidovic, R. N. Taylor, and D. S. Rosenblum, “Software architecture and component technologies: Bridging the gap,” 1998. [Online]. Available: http://www.objs.com/workshops/ws9801/papers/paper007.pdf.
[60] A. Jansen and J. Bosch, “Software architecture as a set of architectural design decisions,” in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2005.61.
